Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2008
Publication Citation
21 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 1259 (2008)
Abstract
In this overview, I begin by describing the five different systems of state judicial selection that have evolved out of a perennial struggle to strike an optimal balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability. I then explore recent developments that have intensified that struggle, before analyzing, with reference to available research, how different selection systems counter or accommodate such developments. My purpose here is not to write (another) position piece. Rather, my purpose is to step back and contextualize disputes over judicial selection with reference to the independence and accountability issues that animate them, and to isolate what we know and don't know about the assumptions that underlie the arguments of the disputants, so as to better frame future study and debate.
Recommended Citation
Geyh, Charles G., "The Endless Judicial Selection Debate and Why It Matters for Judicial Independence" (2008). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 55.
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/55
Comments
Reprinted with permission of the publisher, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics © 2008.