109 California Law Review 1107 (2021)
Race and law scholars almost uniformly prefer antisubordination to anticlassification as the best way to understand and adjudicate racism. In this short Essay, we explore whether the antisubordination framework is sufficiently capacious to meet our present demands for racial justice. We argue that the antisubordination approach relies on a particular conception of racism, which we call pathological racism, that limits its capacity for addressing the fundamental restructuring that racial justice requires. We suggest, in a manner that might be viewed as counterintuitive, that targeted universalist remedies might be more effective to address long term racial inequality but might also be the more radical approach to addressing racial discrimination.
Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis and Charles, Guy-Uriel, "Pathological Racism, Chronic Racism & Targeted Universalism" (2021). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2996.