Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
Publication Citation
94 Iowa Law Review 1315 (2009)
Abstract
Recent SEC enforcement actions, such as the case filed against Dallas Mavericks' owner Mark Cuban, raise the question whether deception by a fiduciary is essential to the Rule 10b-5 insider trading offense. Under the Supreme Court's classical and misappropriation theories, the answer is clearly yes - each theory has a fiduciary principle at its core. Yet lower courts and the SEC frequently disregard the Court's explicit dictates, and a consensus is emerging that insider trading rests simply on the wrongful use of material nonpublic information, regardless of whether a fiduciary-like duty is breached. Although this view of insider trading can be justified by the policy objectives underlying the Court's decision in United States v. O'Hagan, it currently lacks a solid doctrinal foundation. To resolve this anomaly, this Article offers specific suggestions that would bring much needed coherence and legitimacy to the law of insider trading.
Recommended Citation
Nagy, Donna M., "Insider Trading and the Gradual Demise of Fiduciary Principles" (2009). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 34.
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/34