"The Defamation of Choice-of-Law in Cyberspace: Countering the View tha" by Philip Adam Davis

Article Title

The Defamation of Choice-of-Law in Cyberspace: Countering the View that the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is Inadequate to Navigate the Borderless Reaches of the Intangible Frontier

Authors

Philip Adam Davis, Indiana University School of Law

Document Type

Note

Publication Date

3-2002

Publication Citation

54 Federal Communications Law Journal 339 (2002)

Abstract

This Note examines the adequacy of the traditional choice-of-law rules, including the Restatement (Second), in interstate cyber-defamation disputes, and argues that there is nothing different or unique about cyberspace which warrants the modification or abandonment of traditional choice-of-law regimes for cyber-defamation disputes.

Recommended Citation

Davis, Philip Adam (2002) "The Defamation of Choice-of-Law in Cyberspace: Countering the View that the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is Inadequate to Navigate the Borderless Reaches of the Intangible Frontier," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 54: Iss. 2, Article 6.
Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol54/iss2/6

Download

Included in

Communications Law Commons, Internet Law Commons

COinS