•  
  •  
 
Indiana Law Journal

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2025

Publication Citation

100 Indiana Law Journal 1611

Abstract

Silicon Valley, and the U.S. tech sector more broadly, have changed the world in part by embracing a “move fast and break things” mentality popularized by Mark Zuckerberg. While it is true that the tech sector has attempted to break with such a reactive and flippant response to security concerns, including at Microsoft itself through its Security Development Lifecycle, cyberattacks continue at an alarming rate. As a result, there are growing calls from regulators around the world to change the risk equation. An example is the 2023 U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy, which argues that “[w]e must hold the stewards of our data accountable for the protection of personal data; drive the development of more secure connected devices; and reshape laws that govern liability for data losses and harm caused by cybersecurity errors, software vulnerabilities, and other risks created by software and digital technologies.” What exact form such liability should take is up for debate. The defect model of products liability law is one clear option, and courts across the United States have already been applying it using both strict liability and risk utility framings in a variety of cases. This Article delves into the debates by considering how other cyber powers around the world—including the European Union—are extending products liability law to cover software, and it examines the lessons these efforts hold for U.S. policymakers with case studies focusing on liability for AI-generated content and Internet-connected critical infrastructure.

Download

Share

COinS