90 Indiana Law Journal Supplement 52 (2015)
This Article first scrutinizes the Obama Administration confirmation and nomination processes. It then critically explores selection and concludes that Republican obstruction instigated the most open positions the longest time. Because this deficiency undermines swift, economical, and fair case resolution, the Article suggests ideas to promptly decrease the remaining unoccupied judgeships after the session commences.
Tobias, Carl W.
"Judicial Selection in Congress’ Lame Duck Session,"
Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 90:
5, Article 5.
Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol90/iss5/5