It has been a little over a year and a half since the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking venue decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, shaking up the status quo in U.S. patent infringement litigation. The first months after TC Heartland saw a flurry of activity as litigants and courts wrestled with the impact of the decision on pending cases, pondered the true meaning of a “regular and established place of business,” and explored many other questions left by the TC Heartland decision. Eighteen months and several writs of mandamus later, it is now a good time to take stock of the newly emerging status quo in patent venue. This article does just that.
Kazhdan, Daniel and Laud, Sanjiv P.
"TC Heartland: It’s Time to Take Stock,"
IP Theory: Vol. 8
, Article 2.
Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ipt/vol8/iss1/2