Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2023
Publication Citation
35 Loyola Consumer Law Review 203 (2023)
Abstract
Student loan servicers are the face of the U.S. student loan system, and they are not well-liked. Using the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (the CFPB) consumer complaint database, we study borrower perceptions of the student loan system. We qualitatively analyzed a sample of complaint narratives drawn from every student loan complaint ever filed with the CFPB. Our analysis of these complaint narratives reveals clear patterns of discontent in four primary areas: 1) a mismatch between ability to repay and repayment options, including problems with forbearance, deferments, the public service loan forgiveness program, income-driven repayment plans, and loan cancellation options; 2) customer service, including sudden and unexplained changes in payment obligations, 3) inappropriate payment processing, such as misapplying payments; and 4) unauthorized loans or outright scams. The first issue was, by far, the most common. Our results highlight areas where better regulation, whether through contract with the government, ex ante supervision by regulators, or ex post lawsuits in court, has the potential to improve the function of the student loan ecosystem.
Recommended Citation
Matthew A. Bruckner & Christopher J. Ryan Jr.,
Student Loans and Financial Distress: A Qualitative Analysis of the Most Common Student Loan Complaints,
35 Loyola Consumer Law Review 203 (2023)
(2023).
Available at:
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/3119